Data-driven research on Applicant Tracking Systems, resume optimization strategies, and how AI is transforming the job search landscape.
of resumes never seen by humans
increase in callbacks with AI optimization
reduction in time-to-hire
average recruiter review time
Comprehensive research on AI-driven ATS optimization, including 35% interview callback improvements, 40% time-to-hire reduction, and 8.4% wage increases.
How Applicant Tracking Systems affect job application success rates, with findings on the 75% rejection rate before human review.
Research showing candidates using AI systems are 23-60% more likely to be shortlisted compared to human-written applications.
Eye-tracking studies reveal recruiters spend an average of 6-7 seconds on initial resume review. Learn what they look at first.
How proper ATS formatting affects parsing rates. Research shows ATS extract ~84% of resume content, but formatting errors can cause rejection.
Comprehensive study of efficiency gains: 27-30% cost-per-hire reduction, 8% higher hiring rates, and measurable wage improvements.
How AI tools help candidates interpret job descriptions and optimize keywords to pass ATS filters significantly more often.
Candidates using AI assistance receive higher wages (8.4%) and more job offers. A deep dive into the economic impact.
Evaluating the effectiveness of various AI resume builders. Which ones actually create ATS-compliant files?
Why machine-selected candidates outperform human picks: 17% higher interview pass rates and better job fit.
No research articles found for this filter.
Use our AI-powered ATS analyzer to see how your resume performs.
Try Free Analysis